UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR

NATIONAL PARK SERVICE

Tuskegee Institute National Historic Site               Tuskegee Airmen National Historic Site
             1212 Old Montgomery Road                      c/o Tuskegee Institute National Historic Site
Tiskegee Institute, AL 36088                                1212 Old Montgomery Road
334-727-6390                                                         334-727-6390
Selma to Montgomery National Historic Trail
PO Box 5690
Montgomery, AL 36103-5690
334-353-3858

September 16, 2002

David Bryson, President
ElectroBraid Fence
236 Water Street, Box 19
Yarmouth
Nova Scotia, Canada
B5A 4P8

Mr. Bryson:

As the former site manager at Katmai National Park in Alaska, I have had a fair amount of experience with large bears and park visitors in remote areas. At Brooks Camp, a remote developed area within the park boundary, rangers spend most of their time keeping Brown Bears and park visitors safely separated. The Brooks River is a favored feeding area for bears during the salmon spawning run and visitors are drawn to this high concentration of carnivores.

The campground at Brooks Camp has been a long-term problem because bears traveling from their resting areas on the mountain would occasionally pass through the campground on their way to feeding areas along the rivers and lakes. Curious bears have sniffed backpacks, tents, and rarely, sleeping campers as they traveled through the area. Although no one has been hurt by the bears, some tents have been damaged and the potential for a human/bear incident is high.

Bears have forced their way into buildings in this area so we knew that a wooden fence would not be a satisfactory deterrent. We had considered stringing barbed wire around the area but bears were generally not sufficiently deterred by the wire either because it is not visible enough or because it is not stout enough to keep them from forcing their way through. We also were concerned about the possibility of the fence wire entangling the bear and possibly causing it physical harm. We saw the ElectroBraid fence in an advertisement and felt that it would be worth a try. Its visibility and elasticity, combined with its ability to conduct current were significant factors in its favor.

We erected a three-strand fence around the campground and the bears immediately began to avoid the area. We observed that bears would initially walk up to the fence, touch it with their noses, and avoid it from that point forward. Eventually we added a fourth strand to serve as a deterrent for small cubs that could pass under the fence without making contact. From that point on, no bears entered the campground with one exception.

The single episode of a bear in the campground during the summer further illustrates that the fence met our needs better than any other solution so far tried. An adult bear chased a sub-adult into the campground area. The sub-adult, under stress, pushed its way through the fence and into the campground. The fence stretched enough to allow the animal through without getting entangled. The adult bear apparently was not interested in pursuing the sub-adult further because it broke of its chase and left the area. The fence was immediately shut off by park staff and the gate was opened so the sub-adult could exit the area. No harm was done to the animal and no visitors were injured in the event.

I understand that the park has continued to use the ElectroBraid fence since I have transferred and they continue to have similar success.

If you need further details, please feel free to contact me.

Sincerely,

John Bundy
Deputy Superintendent.